Subject: Re: [sv-bc] SV-42-23 question and clarification
From: Dave Rich (David.Rich@synopsys.com)
Date: Thu Mar 06 2003 - 23:41:18 PST
Francoise,
I was just trying to simplify the rules without removing any of
semantics. Having a .name port along with .* is just redundant. You are
replacing the default connection with the default connection. I didn't
think the rule was necessary.
Dave
Francoise Martinolle wrote:
> ...
> Are we suppressing all the rules that implicit .name port connections
> cannot be used
> in the same instantiation with with .*, and with positional port
> connections and may be used with named port connections.
> (the last 4 to 7 th rules page 60 and 61)?
> or are these rules also included in the named port connections
> semantic rules?
>
> or there is no such restrictions at all?
> Francoise
> '
>
>
>
-- -- Dave Rich Principal Engineer, CAE, VTG Tel: 650-584-4026 Cell: 510-589-2625 DaveR@Synopsys.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Mar 06 2003 - 23:41:58 PST