Subject: Re: [sv-bc] SV-BC62b packed arrays of packed structs not in draft4
From: Dave Rich (David.Rich@synopsys.com)
Date: Tue Apr 08 2003 - 16:32:49 PDT
David,
The BNF was correctly modified. It seems just the LRM section 4.2
correction was overlooked.
So the answer is yes to the first question. No change to the BNF is
required, so the second question is moot.
David W. Smith wrote:
>Hi Dave,
>So, this is a request to have the contents incorporated in the list of
>changes?
>
>Is the BNF in a form that is consistent with the Draft 4 BNF?
>
>If the answer to both of these is yes then I will go ahead and add it.
>Otherwise ...
>
>Regards
>David
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Dave Rich" <David.Rich@Synopsys.COM>
>To: <sv-bc@eda.org>; "David W. Smith" <david.smith@Synopsys.COM>
>Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 10:02 PM
>Subject: [sv-bc] SV-BC62b packed arrays of packed structs not in draft4
>
>
>
>
>>SV-BC62 was passed but was not inclued in draft4
>>
>>It is marked as complete in
>>http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/att-0688/03-BC_Issues_03_03_25.htm
>>but it is missing the actual proposal, which is supposed to be
>>http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0414.html
>>
>>--
>>--
>>Dave Rich
>>Principal Engineer, CAE, VTG
>>Tel: 650-584-4026
>>Cell: 510-589-2625
>>DaveR@Synopsys.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
-- -- Dave Rich Principal Engineer, CAE, VTG Tel: 650-584-4026 Cell: 510-589-2625 DaveR@Synopsys.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Apr 08 2003 - 16:34:55 PDT