Subject: Re: [sv-bc] RE: LRM Issues Review
From: Dave Rich (David.Rich@synopsys.com)
Date: Thu Apr 10 2003 - 21:49:43 PDT
David W. Smith wrote:
> LRM-50: So when do I get the "semantic check" verbiage to add to
> the LRM? Tommorrow is the last day.
>
Existing port connection sematics take care of this.
> LRM-52: So which is it? Leave it the way it is or remove the enum?
>
leave it. Existing sematic rules take care of it. DPI might need it also
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Apr 10 2003 - 21:50:17 PDT