Subject: [sv-bc] Vote on the 3.1 systemVerilog LRM
From: Francoise Martinolle (fm@cadence.com)
Date: Thu Apr 24 2003 - 11:15:56 PDT
Cadence is voting NO. A negative ballot document which contains review
comments related to the bc committee work will be mailed to all the
reflectors by Jay Lawrence.
At 10:34 AM 4/23/2003 +0300, Srouji, Johny wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>
>
>This is a reminder that I am expecting your votes by Tomorrow (Thu) 5:00
>pm PDT.
>
>I would appreciate that ALL members (including non eligible) vote, as your
>opinions will be tracked and it is important to hear your voice.
>
>
>
>For the representatives assigned below, please fill in the following line:
>
>
>
>__ YES _X_ NO Approve sending the LRM (the work performed by SV-BC) to
>the board for their approval.
>
>
>
>Thank you all for excellent work done!
>
>
>
>--- Johny.
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Srouji, Johny
>Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 9:02 PM
>To: sv-bc@eda.org
>Cc: Srouji, Johny; 'Karen'; 'Vassilios.Gerousis@infineon.com'
>Subject: [SV-BC] Process and schedule for final LRM vote
>Importance: High
>
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>
>
>Following the TCC meeting last Friday and David Smith note capturing the
>voting process and schedule, I suggest that we follow a similar process
>for our committee, as outlined below. I have also made some suggestions.
>Please let me know ASAP if you have any comments or issues w/ this process.
>
>
>
>· We shall have the voting by EMAIL. If someone strongly feels we
>should have a meeting for this, send me a note.
>
>· Voting must complete by 24 April (Thursday) at 5:00 pm (pacific).
>
>· Based on the attendance rule of 3/4 last meetings - here is a
>list of eligible voting members for SV-BC:
>Johny Srouji (Intel),
>Karen Pieper (Synopsys),
>Gord Vreugdenhil (Synopsys),
>Brad Pierce (Synopsys),
>Francoise Martinolle (Cadence),
>Dan Jacobi (Intel),
>David Rich (Synopsys),
>Matt Maidment (Intel),
>
>Kevin Cameron (NSC) - OK attendance wise, but NSC is not an eligible member
>· All participants will vote by company (even non-eligible
>companies due to attendance or not being Accellera members). This is
>desired to make sure that all participant companies have a voice.
>non-eligible company votes will not be counted but they will be tracked.
>
>· I suggest that each of the voting companies choose a
>representative to submit their vote. Here is my suggestion for the
>eligible voting companies:
>Cadence: Francoise Martinolle
>Synopsis: David Rich
>Intel: Matt Maidment
>As for the non eligible companies:
>NSC: Kevin Cameron
>Sunburst Design: Cliff Cummings
>Model Technology: Dennis Brophy
>LCDM Engineering: Don Mills
>Verisity: Mike McNamara
>Boyd Technology: Stefen Boyd
>HMC: Heath Chambers
>Fintronic: Alec F. Stanculescu
>· Please send your vote directly to me
>(<mailto:johny.srouji@intel.com>johny.srouji@intel.com) and to Karen
>Pieper (<mailto:Karen.Pieper@synopsys.com>Karen.Pieper@synopsys.com)
>
>· The vote will be approved if 2/3s of the eligible companies vote
>and approve.
>
>· Each committee votes only on the work they have done (sections
>of the LRM or content to sections) as a single vote that indicates the
>committees work is to be sent to the board for acceptance.
>
>· The votes will be tallied on Friday.
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>
>--- Johny.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Apr 24 2003 - 12:26:58 PDT