Subject: Re: [sv-bc] packed dimensions and range
From: Brad Pierce (Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com)
Date: Fri Oct 10 2003 - 08:35:21 PDT
I think this is a duplicate of SV-EC issue ERR-9 --
http://www.eda.org/sv-ec/hm/1357.html
-- Brad
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org]On Behalf Of
Guillermo Maturana
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 12:41 AM
To: sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-bc] packed dimensions and range
I fail to see why the LRM gives rules like
{ packed_dimension } [range] or
{ packed_dimension } range
for example, local_parameter_declaration and
port_type respectively. A packed_dimension is the
same as a range, with the exception of open
packed_dimension. The latter is only used for import
dpi functions, and even there only a single open
packed dimension is allowed. Would it be better to
wipe out the mention of range in favor of
packed_dimension? It would probably help if the
quirk in footnote 9 (import dpi function) was made
into a separate data type with an explicit single open
packed dimension as an alternative. That way the generic
rule for packed dimension would indeed be identical to
range.
_Matute
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Oct 10 2003 - 08:38:49 PDT