Re: [sv-bc] email voting on Cliff's proposal

Subject: Re: [sv-bc] email voting on Cliff's proposal
From: Peter Flake (Peter.Flake@synopsys.com)
Date: Wed Jan 07 2004 - 09:45:53 PST

Hi Johny,

I vote in favour of Cliff's proposal, but I have noticed that it would be clearer if the following text and example were swapped, since the text refers to the previous example.

REPLACE
 module m (i2 i);
  ...
endmodule

module s (i2 i);
  ...
endmodule

module top;
  i2 i();

  m u1 (.i(i.master));
  s u2 (.i(i.slave));
endmodule

The syntax of interface_name.modport_name reference_name gives a local name for a hierarchical reference. Note that this can be generalized to any interface with a given modport name by writing interface.modport_name reference_name.

WITH

The syntax of interface_name.modport_name reference_name gives a local name for a hierarchical reference. Note that this can be generalized to any interface with a given modport name by writing interface.modport_name reference_name.

 module m (i2 i);
  ...
endmodule

module s (i2 i);
  ...
endmodule

module top;
  i2 i();

  m u1 (.i(i.master));
  s u2 (.i(i.slave));
endmodule

[  X]   I agree with the changes made in the attached proposal

Peter.

At 10:49 06/01/2004 +0200, Srouji, Johny wrote:

Hi All,

 

Cliff has verified there is no impact by the proposed changes in his proposal by existing changes in draft2 of SV 3.1a. Attached is the modified document based on the review and proposed changes we discussed in the meeting yesterday.

As agreed in our meeting yesterday, I am sending this proposal for email voting. Based on the attendance rule of 3 out of 4 last meetings, following are the voting members:

 

Matt Maidment     

Brad Pierce        

Karen Pieper      

Johny Srouji

Dave Rich           

Francoise Martinolle

Cliff Cummings      

Mark Hartoog        

 Doug Warmke      

Rishiyur Nikhil    

Stu Sutherland    

Peter Flake

 

Note: as a chair, I don t get to vote unless there is a tie


All voting members: please send me your voting decision no later than Wed 5:00 pm PST. Please mark-up one of the following options:

 

[   ]   I agree with the changes made in the attached proposal

[   ]   I oppose to the changes made in the attached proposal

[   ]   I abstain

 

Voting members who will not send me their reply by the above deadline, will not be counted in (you are highly encouraged to send me your reply).

 

Thanks,

 

--- Johny.

 

 

 

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jan 07 2004 - 09:47:28 PST