RE: [sv-bc] Issues updated to reflect mail, minutes

Subject: RE: [sv-bc] Issues updated to reflect mail, minutes
From: Srouji, Johny (johny.srouji@intel.com)
Date: Sun Jan 11 2004 - 23:22:34 PST

• Next message: Srouji, Johny: "[sv-bc] [SV-BC] sv-bc tele-call next Monday, Jan 19th"
• Previous message: David W. Smith: "[sv-bc] Editor's Notes in 3.1a Draft 3 LRM"
• Maybe in reply to: Karen L. Pieper: "[sv-bc] Issues updated to reflect mail, minutes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I think it should be marked as closed (passed). Cliff's proposal passed,
including for the people (Dave and Peter) who suggested few changes and
voted as "agreed". If their vote was as "abstain" or pending making
these changes, I would have left it as open.

Nevertheless, we should dedicate 5-10 mins in our next meeting to go
over the proposed changes and make an assessment whether they should or
should not be included.

--- Johny.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Karen L. Pieper
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 5:25 AM
To: sv-bc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-bc] Issues updated to reflect mail, minutes

Hi all,

        I've updated the issues pages to reflect email traffic and
minutes
of the last meeting. Please let me know if I need to add something.

Note: Because of the changes to Cliff's proposal after the email vote,
I have not yet updated it as passed. Johny is it ok to do so, or do we
need to vote again.

Thanks,

Karen

• Next message: Srouji, Johny: "[sv-bc] [SV-BC] sv-bc tele-call next Monday, Jan 19th"
• Previous message: David W. Smith: "[sv-bc] Editor's Notes in 3.1a Draft 3 LRM"
• Maybe in reply to: Karen L. Pieper: "[sv-bc] Issues updated to reflect mail, minutes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Jan 11 2004 - 23:24:00 PST