[sv-bc] Proposal for SV-BC-105 aggregate expressions vs concatenation

Subject: [sv-bc] Proposal for SV-BC-105 aggregate expressions vs concatenation
From: Dave Rich (David.Rich@synopsys.com)
Date: Thu Jan 15 2004 - 10:05:36 PST

• Next message: Dave Rich: "Re: [sv-bc] Proposal for SV-BC-105 aggregate expressions vs concatenation"
• Previous message: Francoise Martinolle: "[sv-bc] 2 erratas"
• Reply: Dave Rich: "Re: [sv-bc] Proposal for SV-BC-105 aggregate expressions vs concatenation"
• Reply: Greg Jaxon: "Re: [sv-bc] Proposal for SV-BC-105 aggregate expressions vs concatenation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Here is my proposal for SV-105 (and 107, 124)

I will not be able to attend Monday's meeting, so I welcome comments
before then.

Dave

-- 
--
David.Rich@Synopsys.com
Technical Marketing Consultant
http://www.SystemVerilog.org
tele:  650-584-4026
cell:  510-589-2625

• Next message: Dave Rich: "Re: [sv-bc] Proposal for SV-BC-105 aggregate expressions vs concatenation"
• Previous message: Francoise Martinolle: "[sv-bc] 2 erratas"
• Reply: Dave Rich: "Re: [sv-bc] Proposal for SV-BC-105 aggregate expressions vs concatenation"
• Reply: Greg Jaxon: "Re: [sv-bc] Proposal for SV-BC-105 aggregate expressions vs concatenation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Jan 15 2004 - 10:06:49 PST