[sv-bc] New errata for enumeration type bnf definition


Subject: [sv-bc] New errata for enumeration type bnf definition
From: Francoise Martinolle (fm@cadence.com)
Date: Fri Jan 16 2004 - 11:40:08 PST


I believe that the BNF is not correct and does not support the following
legal enumeration type:

enum [3:0] = {a, b, c, b};

The bnf seems to require to have the bit or logic qualifier before the range.

Francoise
        '



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Jan 16 2004 - 11:46:32 PST