Subject: Results from rating
From: David Smith (david.smith@synopsys.com)
Date: Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:57:33 PDT
I have received 3 people that responded to the prioritization request (Kevin C., Stephen B., Alec V.) with an additional single vote on one item (Karen P.). Stefen and Karen were verbal on this mornings SV-BC call.
The results are contained in the attached file.
The items in order of priority are:
viii. Alias (3)
xii. Process Control (3.25)
i. Data Channels (3.75)
iv. FSM (3.75)
v. Exterm Modules (4.25)
xi. Inferred Reg Types (4.25)
x. Multi-clock/Hier. FSM (4.5)
vii. Data Path (5)
ii. Pointers (5.25)
ix. Inherited declarations (5.25)
iii. Force/release with strengths (5.5)
vi. OO (5.75)
Based on this I would recommend that anything with less than 5 we should agree to not try and address for 3.1.
David
David W. Smith
Synopsys Scientist
Synopsys, Inc.
9205 SW Gemini Drive
Beaverton, OR 97008
Voice: 503.520.2715
FAX: 503.643.3361
Email: david.smith@synopsys.com <mailto:david.smith@synopsys.com>
<http://www.synopsys.com/> http://www.synopsys.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 11:19:41 PDT