Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Asychronous mailbox proposal
From: Kevin Cameron (sv-xx@grfx.com)
Date: Thu Dec 12 2002 - 20:25:01 PST
> From: Stuart Sutherland <stuart@sutherland-hdl.com>
>
> At 04:41 PM 12/12/2002, Kevin Cameron x3251 wrote:
> >BTW, when was striking out dynamic processes approved?
>
> It was in the change instructions I received from the SV-EC. The change
> explicitly said to replace the process section with the new fork-join section.
>
> Stu
I know you got those instructions, I just don't remember the EC having
come to a decision between the two approaches - I was under the impression
it was just defered until we discussed process creation and control in
general.
According to Vassilios folks are already using 3.0 and the process statement.
I don't think they'll be happy doing rewrites.
Kev.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Dec 12 2002 - 21:26:05 PST