Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Re: $wait_all/any/...
From: Steven Sharp (sharp@cadence.com)
Date: Sun Dec 22 2002 - 19:30:59 PST
>Using @(a then b then c) is a distinct possibility, but I wonder if it may be
>misleading to people who think it's just a shorthand for @a @b @c as Mac
>was suggesting.
>
>As for your second question, I did mean it the way it is written.
>wait_order(a,b,c,d) as specified today will accept a,b,a,c,d.
And so will @a @b @c @d, so what is the difference?
Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Dec 22 2002 - 19:31:38 PST