RE: [sv-ec] Proposal for Section 4 [*] syntax

Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Proposal for Section 4 [*] syntax
From: David W. Smith (david.smith@synopsys.com)
Date: Mon Jan 13 2003 - 16:08:41 PST

Next message: David W. Smith: "RE: [sv-ec] Typos in/comments on SV3.1/draft 1/Section 4 (Arrays)"
Previous message: David W. Smith: "[sv-ec] Minutes of meeting on 13 January 2003."
In reply to: Kevin Cameron: "[sv-ec] Proposal for Section 4 [*] syntax"
Reply: David W. Smith: "RE: [sv-ec] Proposal for Section 4 [*] syntax"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Kevin,
Please bring this up as a motion in the next meeting (where appropriate).

Regards
David

David W. Smith
Synopsys Scientist

Synopsys, Inc.
Synopsys Technology Park
2025 NW Cornelius Pass Road
Hillsboro, OR 97124

Voice: 503.547.6467
Main: 503.547.6000
FAX: 503.547.6906
Email: david.smith@synopsys.com
http://www.synopsys.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Kevin
Cameron
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:51 AM
To: sv-ec
Subject: [sv-ec] Proposal for Section 4 [*] syntax

[For next voting meeting]

In keeping with the principal that C-like functionality should have C
syntax, I propose using the '[]' syntax for unsized dynamic arrays, and
using '[*]' for associative arrays, since C doesn't support associative
arrays.

Kev.

--
National Semiconductor, Tel: (408) 721 3251
2900 Semiconductor Drive, Mail Stop D3-500, Santa Clara, CA 95052-8090

Next message: David W. Smith: "RE: [sv-ec] Typos in/comments on SV3.1/draft 1/Section 4 (Arrays)"
Previous message: David W. Smith: "[sv-ec] Minutes of meeting on 13 January 2003."
In reply to: Kevin Cameron: "[sv-ec] Proposal for Section 4 [*] syntax"
Reply: David W. Smith: "RE: [sv-ec] Proposal for Section 4 [*] syntax"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Jan 13 2003 - 16:10:54 PST