[sv-ec] Program as Process?

Subject: [sv-ec] Program as Process?
From: Kevin Cameron (Kevin.Cameron@nsc.com)
Date: Mon Jan 27 2003 - 11:49:25 PST

• Next message: Dave Rich: "Re: [sv-ec] final block proposal to SV-EC."
• Previous message: David W. Smith: "RE: [sv-ec] final block proposal to SV-EC."
• In reply to: Mehdi Mohtashemi: "[sv-ec] final block proposal to SV-EC."
• Next in thread: Steven Sharp: "Re: [sv-ec] final block proposal to SV-EC."
• Reply: Kevin Cameron: "[sv-ec] Program as Process?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I was wondering if it would be better to make program a special kind
of process rather than declaring it in a manner similar to modules and
interfaces, it seems to have similar semantics to an initial block.

Kev.

--
National Semiconductor, Tel: (408) 721 3251
2900 Semiconductor Drive, Mail Stop D3-500, Santa Clara, CA 95052-8090

• Next message: Dave Rich: "Re: [sv-ec] final block proposal to SV-EC."
• Previous message: David W. Smith: "RE: [sv-ec] final block proposal to SV-EC."
• In reply to: Mehdi Mohtashemi: "[sv-ec] final block proposal to SV-EC."
• Next in thread: Steven Sharp: "Re: [sv-ec] final block proposal to SV-EC."
• Reply: Kevin Cameron: "[sv-ec] Program as Process?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Jan 27 2003 - 11:49:36 PST