Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Proposal on making program blocks procedural
From: David W. Smith (david.smith@synopsys.com)
Date: Wed Feb 05 2003 - 10:39:59 PST
The Scheduling Semantics Working Group was formed by the TCC chairs with
them nominating the members. It's charter is to review and refine the
scheduling semantics. The result will be a recommendation to the full SV
committee with regards to the Scheduling Semantics.
The members of the group are:
Chair: David Smith (non-voting)
Voting Members:
Faisal Haque, Cisco
Matt Maidment, Intel
Michael Rohleder, Motorola
Neil Korpusik, Sun
Bassam Tabbara, Novas
Dennis Brophy, Model Tech
Jay Lawrence, Cadence
Joao Geada, Synopsys
Proponents (single vote for group):
Arturo Salz
Peter Flake
Phil Moorby
Regards
David
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Kevin
Cameron
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:58 AM
To: Jay Lawrence
Cc: sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Proposal on making program blocks procedural
Jay Lawrence wrote:
> Attached you will find a proposal on making the program block a purely
> procedural construct instead of a hierarchical construct. The
> semantics of the program block are completely preserved in this
> proposal, pending the outcome of the simulation semantics working
> group. The hierarchical nature of programs is preserved and enhanced
> by allowing the sequential program block to occur in modules,
> eliminating the overlap between program and module declarations and
> allowing test-benches to be hierarchical.
>
> Jay
>
I think that's where I was going with my previous posting:
http://www.eda.org/vlog-pp/sv-ec/hm/0539.html
Who's in the simulation semantics working group? How do I sign up?
Kev.
-- National Semiconductor, Tel: (408) 721 3251 2900 Semiconductor Drive, Mail Stop D3-500, Santa Clara, CA 95052-8090
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Feb 05 2003 - 10:41:16 PST