Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Event Proposals
From: David W. Smith (david.smith@synopsys.com)
Date: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 19:58:49 PST
Thanks Stefen,
Sounds good. Let's do a straw vote that closes by the end of Tuesday. Real
vote on Thursday.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Stefen
Boyd
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:48 PM
To: sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] Event Proposals
All,
I've summarized the proposals that have been floating
around related to events and deracing them. We will
vote on the proposals at the face to face meeting next Thursday. If you want
to get your vote in before the meeting, it might help David figure out the
top two before the meeting for a final vote.
Stefen
******** Summary of proposals for voting **********
Select preference order (1=most, 4=least):
___ 1.1 Add persistent event type, enhance wait
___ 1.2 Add persistent event type, enhance event control
___ 1.3 Enhance trigger only: ->>
___ 1.4 Enhance synchronization only: .active
Select preference order (1=most, 3=least):
___ 2.2.1 $wait_xxx
___ 2.2.2 wait_xxx
___ 2.2.3 @(event1 *magic_operator* event2)
If 2.2.3 selected, then choose operator for ordered events (order preference
1=most, 6=least): ___ -> ___ --> ___ => ___ =>> ___ ; ___ before
--------------------
Stefen Boyd Boyd Technology, Inc.
stefen@BoydTechInc.com (408)739-BOYD
www.BoydTechInc.com (408)739-1402 (fax)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Feb 19 2003 - 20:00:36 PST