Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Email Vote 4 (take 2)
From: David W. Smith (david.smith@synopsys.com)
Date: Mon Feb 24 2003 - 09:24:15 PST
Hi Jay,
Thanks for the vote. With respect to the comments on CH-102.
1. I understand the concern. We will have to discuss this at Thursday's
meeting.
2. My understanding is that SV-CC has dealt with the layout issues and this
is their requirement for the change in the language. The rest of the
interface will be defined in their, soon to be released, Part 2 of the LRM.
Regards
David
David W. Smith
Synopsys Scientist
Synopsys, Inc.
Synopsys Technology Park
2025 NW Cornelius Pass Road
Hillsboro, OR 97124
Voice: 503.547.6467
Main: 503.547.6000
FAX: 503.547.6906
Email: david.smith@synopsys.com
http://www.synopsys.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Jay
Lawrence
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 9:30 AM
To: David W. Smith; sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Email Vote 4 (take 2)
The following are the list of changes that need approval. Please consider
each and vote on them.
_X_yes __no 1. Approve CH-10
__yes _X_no 2. Approve CH-102
1) I don't like this keyword, maybe something like Chandle would
avoid more conflicts with existing names and the wording in CH-104
2) Has the sv-cc dealt with all the other layout compatibility
issues from SV to 'C'. If not, adding this type is premature.
_X_yes __no 3. Approve CH-103
_X_yes __no 4. Approve CH-104
_X_yes __no 5. Approve CH-106
_X_yes __no 6. Approve CH-107
_X_yes __no 7. Approve CH-108
===================================
Jay Lawrence
Architect - Functional Verification
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
(978) 262-6294
lawrence@cadence.com
===================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Feb 24 2003 - 09:25:33 PST