Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Comments on updated event proposal
From: Neil Korpusik (Neil.Korpusik@eng.sun.com)
Date: Fri Mar 14 2003 - 09:46:46 PST
I don't particularly care for the wait_order syntax in the latest event
proposal.
The following is another possible option that uses the builtin method
concept:
event a,b,c;
a.wait_order(a,b,c); // or a.wait_order(a.triggered,b,c);
if (a.wait_order_failed) begin
...
end
Notes:
1. wait_order() is a builtin method
2. wait_order() could be called for any event in the list
3. wait_order_failed is a builtin property
3. wait_order_failed would be reset in the preponed region of a timestep.
Neil
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Mar 14 2003 - 09:47:41 PST