[sv-ec] Re: [sv-ac] templates

Subject: [sv-ec] Re: [sv-ac] templates
From: Adam Krolnik (krolnik@lsil.com)
Date: Fri Apr 11 2003 - 15:51:33 PDT

• Next message: David W. Smith: "[sv-ec] RE: [sv-bc] review of chapter 11 (Classes)"
• Previous message: Faisal Haque: "[sv-ec] RE: [sv-ac] templates"
• In reply to: Faisal Haque: "[sv-ec] RE: [sv-ac] templates"
• Next in thread: Faisal Haque: "RE: [sv-ec] Re: [sv-ac] templates"
• Reply: Adam Krolnik: "[sv-ec] Re: [sv-ac] templates"
• Reply: Faisal Haque: "RE: [sv-ec] Re: [sv-ac] templates"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Faisal;

>We are leaning toward taking [templates] out...

I presume this also applies to bind functionality...

This should also go with templates to the SV-EC committee.

    Adam Krolnik
    Verification Mgr.
    LSI Logic Corp.
    Plano TX. 75074

• Next message: David W. Smith: "[sv-ec] RE: [sv-bc] review of chapter 11 (Classes)"
• Previous message: Faisal Haque: "[sv-ec] RE: [sv-ac] templates"
• In reply to: Faisal Haque: "[sv-ec] RE: [sv-ac] templates"
• Next in thread: Faisal Haque: "RE: [sv-ec] Re: [sv-ac] templates"
• Reply: Adam Krolnik: "[sv-ec] Re: [sv-ac] templates"
• Reply: Faisal Haque: "RE: [sv-ec] Re: [sv-ac] templates"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Apr 11 2003 - 15:53:15 PDT