[sv-ec] Conflict due to range and packed_dimension

Subject: [sv-ec] Conflict due to range and packed_dimension
From: Kausik Datta (kausikd@cal.interrasystems.com)
Date: Tue Sep 09 2003 - 04:54:36 PDT

• Next message: David W. Smith: "[sv-ec] Templates for use in LRM Changes and Submissions"
• Previous message: Kausik Datta: "[sv-ec] Conflict in the sequence_expr BNF"
• Next in thread: David W. Smith: "RE: [sv-ec] Conflict due to range and packed_dimension"
• Reply: David W. Smith: "RE: [sv-ec] Conflict due to range and packed_dimension"
• Reply: Brad Pierce: "Re: [sv-ec] Conflict due to range and packed_dimension"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

The following rule has both packed_dimension and range non-terminals.

BNF sec A.2.2.1

data_type ::=
    integer_vector_type [ signing ] { packed_dimension } [ range ]

But rules for packed_dimension and range in sec A.2.5 are same.

Do we really need [range] at all in the BNF? Instead of that we can use
only packed_dimension.
Few other related rules also have the similar problem.

Thanks
Kausik

• Next message: David W. Smith: "[sv-ec] Templates for use in LRM Changes and Submissions"
• Previous message: Kausik Datta: "[sv-ec] Conflict in the sequence_expr BNF"
• Next in thread: David W. Smith: "RE: [sv-ec] Conflict due to range and packed_dimension"
• Reply: David W. Smith: "RE: [sv-ec] Conflict due to range and packed_dimension"
• Reply: Brad Pierce: "Re: [sv-ec] Conflict due to range and packed_dimension"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Sep 09 2003 - 04:58:58 PDT