Subject: RE: [sv-ec] EMAIL VOTE on Errata and Extensions
From: Jay Lawrence (lawrence@cadence.com)
Date: Fri Oct 31 2003 - 10:03:49 PST
Errata:
ERR-09 For_X Against_ Abstain
ERR-23 For_X Against_ Abstain
ERR-25 For_X Against_ Abstain
ERR-27 For_X Against_ Abstain
ERR-28 For_X Against_ Abstain
ERR-29 For_X Against_ Abstain
ERR-31 For_ Against_X Abstain
I believe this should be rejected or made optional in the syntax. It
will be common for users to expect to type this since all other
function/task declarations require them. Those that know the shortcut
will use it, those that do not will be upset with the inconsistent
syntax.
ERR-32 For_X Against_ Abstain
ERR-33 For_X Against_ Abstain
ERR-34 For_X Against_ Abstain
ERR-35 For_X Against_ Abstain
ERR-38 For_X Against_ Abstain
ERR-39 For_X Against_ Abstain
ERR-43 For_X Against_ Abstain
Extensions:
Are you your companies representative: Yes_X No_
EXT-11 For_ Against_ X Abstain
Queues suffers from the same issues that caused us to vote against SV
3.1. Including:
- there are lots of queues in the world this built-in only
represents one
- if we had dynamic data structures the user could build this
- if we wanted to standardize it so the user didn't have to, we
should do it as a package using language features not through more
keywords
- methods should be reserved for classes, queues are not a class
EXT-15 For_X Against_ Abstain
The vote will close on 31 October 2003 at 5:00pm Pacific time.
===================================
Jay Lawrence
Senior Architect
Functional Verification
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
(978) 262-6294
lawrence@cadence.com
===================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Oct 31 2003 - 10:10:34 PST