RE: [sv-ec] Email Vote on errata and extension

Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Email Vote on errata and extension
From: Ryan, Ray (Ray_Ryan@mentorg.com)
Date: Sun Nov 23 2003 - 12:07:48 PST

• Next message: Michael Burns: "Re: [sv-ec] Email Vote on errata and extension"
• Previous message: David W. Smith: "[sv-ec] Neil Korpusik's vote"
• Maybe in reply to: David W. Smith: "[sv-ec] Email Vote on errata and extension"
• Next in thread: Michael Burns: "Re: [sv-ec] Email Vote on errata and extension"
• Maybe reply: Ryan, Ray: "RE: [sv-ec] Email Vote on errata and extension"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Below is my vote.
  _____

            ERR-5: Modify the built-in namespace proposal to be
consistent with packages

                         __Yes X __No

  _____

 
I will vote yes with:
 - the package is named ("std")
 - text change from email discussion (combining Arturo and Davids
replys)
 
  "... The built-in package is implicitly wildcard imported into the
compilation-unit
     scope of every compilation unit (see Section 18.4). ..."

 
Ray

• Next message: Michael Burns: "Re: [sv-ec] Email Vote on errata and extension"
• Previous message: David W. Smith: "[sv-ec] Neil Korpusik's vote"
• Maybe in reply to: David W. Smith: "[sv-ec] Email Vote on errata and extension"
• Next in thread: Michael Burns: "Re: [sv-ec] Email Vote on errata and extension"
• Maybe reply: Ryan, Ray: "RE: [sv-ec] Email Vote on errata and extension"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Nov 23 2003 - 12:08:43 PST