RE: [sv-ec] Built-in Package proposal (revised)

Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Built-in Package proposal (revised)
From: David W. Smith (David.Smith@synopsys.com)
Date: Mon Nov 24 2003 - 10:32:12 PST

• Next message: David W. Smith: "RE: [sv-ec] Ext-3 Virtual Interfaces"
• Previous message: Adam Krolnik: "Re: [sv-ec] Built-in Package proposal (revised)"
• In reply to: Adam Krolnik: "Re: [sv-ec] Built-in Package proposal (revised)"
• Reply: David W. Smith: "RE: [sv-ec] Built-in Package proposal (revised)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Adam,
Already an AI once the proposal is complete.

Regards
David

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Krolnik [mailto:krolnik@lsil.com]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 7:35 AM
To: David.Smith@Synopsys.COM
Cc: 'sv-ec@server.eda.org'
Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Built-in Package proposal (revised)

HI David;

Will this standard package definition be part of the LRM? It would seem like
this is another appendix that contains the complete definition of the
routines.

     Thanks.

     Adam Krolnik
     Verification Mgr.
     LSI Logic Corp.
     Plano TX. 75074

• Next message: David W. Smith: "RE: [sv-ec] Ext-3 Virtual Interfaces"
• Previous message: Adam Krolnik: "Re: [sv-ec] Built-in Package proposal (revised)"
• In reply to: Adam Krolnik: "Re: [sv-ec] Built-in Package proposal (revised)"
• Reply: David W. Smith: "RE: [sv-ec] Built-in Package proposal (revised)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 10:33:51 PST