RE: [sv-ec] email ballot, voting closes on 30 Nov 2004 (Tuesday)

Here are my email votes:
 
   Errata
    4 Add rs_rule precedence and example in Section 12.16
                 ____ Yes _XX_ No
 
    6 Description of query and inst_query methods
                 _XX_ Yes ____ No
 
   25 Pass by reference behavior of dynamically allocated objects
                 _XX_ Yes ____ No
 
  172 Assignment of values to fixed bins is not specified
                 _XX_ Yes ____ No
 
  250 Bug in 8.5.2 example code (for loop construct)
                 _XX_ Yes ____ No
 
  252 Default bin of a coverpoint in cross
                 _XX_ Yes ____ No
 
  317 Class as bit-stream type
                 _XX_ Yes ____ No
 

Comments on #4. Althought this is my proposal, after further discussion
with
Arturo, I believe that precedence is not the way to solve the ambiguity
- there
are other grammar issues/conflicts. Arturo has a cleaner solution which
I expect
he will be proposing.

- Ray Ryan
Received on Tue Nov 30 17:37:50 2004