Below is my response to the email ballot.
Surrendra
=====================================================================
Please respond to the errata items below, mark X where appropriate,
and place explanation for No vote.
Errata
4 Add rs_rule precedence and example in Section 12.16
____ Yes __X__ No
The precedence change suggested in this proposal conflicts with the
usage of
weight expression in constraint specification. A better solution is to
allow
optional parenthesis around the rule or the weight expression.
6 Description of query and inst_query methods
_X___ Yes ____ No
25 Pass by reference behavior of dynamically allocated objects
__X__ Yes ____ No
172 Assignment of values to fixed bins is not specified
__X__ Yes ____ No
250 Bug in 8.5.2 example code (for loop construct)
_X___ Yes ____ No
252 Default bin of a coverpoint in cross
_X___ Yes ____ No
317 Class as bit-stream type
____ Yes __X__ No
There is no explanation as to why this change is necessary now. Its
better
to discuss the semantics of the current feature and any problems with
it,
rather than remove it.
------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C4D71C.FFAE0FB0
Content-Type: text/html;
Received on Tue Nov 30 17:41:55 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 30 2004 - 17:54:57 PST