Re: [sv-ec]E-mail Vote: Closes 12am PST April 4th 2006

Mehdi Mohtashemi wrote:

> Hi,
> Based on March 27, 2006 sv-ec meeting, we are conducting an email 
> vote on the following mantis item, 1308.
> 
> Please note that the operating guidelines are:
> - Only one (1) week to respond (Midnight April 4, 2006) 
> - An issue passes if there are zero ** NO ** votes and at least
>   half of the eligible voters respond with a YES vote.
> - Any NO vote must be accompanied by a reason.
>   This issue will then be up for discussion at the next conference call.
> 
> As of the March 27th meeting, the eligible voters are (total 11):
> 
> Arturo Salz,
> Cliff Cummings         
> Dave Rich           
> Francoise Martinolle
> Gordon Vreugdenhil
> Neil Korpusik      
> Phil Moorby
> Ray Ryan
> Steven Sharp        
> Stuart Sutherland   
> Surrendra Dudani    
> 
> 
> Please mark your vote below by an x. If No, then specify a 
> reason. Send it to the reflector.
> 
> 1308 Clarifications needed for Abstract classes and virtual methods
> 1308  _X_ Yes   ___ No  


I will vote "yes", though I would still request that the
friendly ammendment that I suggested in the meeting be
applied, namely striking the sentence:
    "Thus, all versions of the virtual method look identical in all
     subclasses."
just before the example.


Gord.


> http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001308
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
Model Technology (Mentor Graphics)                gordonv@model.com