RE: [sv-ec] E-mail Vote (part 2) - mantis 1608

1608  _X__ Yes   __ No

with Doug's friendly amendment. (and data type is two words)

However, there is a grammar error in one of the first bullet points:
IS CURRENTLY:
Assignment of a class object which class data type is assignment
compatible with the target class object SHOULD BE:
Assignment of a class object whose class data type is assignment
compatible with the target class object

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org]
On
> Behalf Of Neil Korpusik
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 7:20 PM
> To: sv-ec@server.eda.org
> Cc: Mehdi Mohtashemi
> Subject: [sv-ec] E-mail Vote (part 2) - mantis 1608
> 
> 1608  ___ Yes   _X_ No
> 
> a. I don't understand how case equality makes any sense for a class
> handle.
[DR>] It just reverts to normal equality for those types that don't have
unknowns.
> b. What about assigning a class handle to the value returned by new()?
[DR>] I think the BNF require you to use new() as the RHS of an
assignment.
> c. There is also the dot-operator for accessing class members.
[DR>] Those cases are covered by the types of those members.
> 
> 
> Neil

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.