I think this looks good. The only comment I have is the second sentence in the second paragraph of the 8.23 changes reads "The return type of an out-of-block declaration shall be specified prior to the out-of-block indication for the method." I know what you are trying to say, but it seems confusing the way it is worded. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Vreugdenhil > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 2:15 PM > To: SV_EC List > Subject: [sv-ec] parameterized class "::" operations and > out-of-block declarations > > I've uploaded a proposal for Mantis 1857 that I believe > captures the agreed upon behaviors from the last name > resolution meeting. > Please review asap and let me know if there are any > substantive problems. > > Gord. > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 > Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Nov 19 10:55:57 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 19 2007 - 10:56:24 PST