Tom, you can certainly enter a Mantis item. We can't of course start any actual work on any proposal until there is a new PAR. There are likely still use model issues here in terms of the rules under which one can associated kinds of "refs". Those are resolvable at a technical level, but may lead to general feature composition questions. This will be a good thing to talk about once we have a new PAR. Gord. Alsop, Thomas R wrote: > Steven, Gord, > > Sure, If there are issues with automatic variables then restricting this > to static ones is fine with me. The major benefit I see from this comes > from accessing/referencing DUT state and interface which are static > anyway. So either of your suggestions (they are very similar) works for > me. A restriction to static is clearly what I want. If that isn't too > much of an implementation issue, I think this will be very beneficial to > add to the language (on the next round of course). Another qualifier on > ref that explicitly states it as 'static' works for me. Do you want me > to post this as an sv-ec mantis issue? > > Thanks, -Tom -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Vreugdenhil 503-685-0808 Model Technology (Mentor Graphics) gordonv@model.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Oct 7 07:11:41 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 07 2008 - 07:12:29 PDT