RE: [sv-ec] ballot issue #105

Hi Dave,
 
Do you think we need to match the following two lines in this context?
 
Section 19.3
"A coverage point can cover a variable or an expression."
Section 19.5
"A coverage point specifies an integral expression that is to be
covered."
 
I believe the second is the generic one.
 
Regds,
Swapnajit
 

 

________________________________

	From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf
Of Scott, David
	Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:02 AM
	To: sv-ec@eda.org
	Subject: [sv-ec] ballot issue #105
	
	
	Ballot issue #105 reads:

		There is no mention of nets/wires being specified in the
coverage model. Refer last line.

	That's entered against 19.2.  The last line includes the phrase
"Associate bins with sets of values, transitions, or cross products".
	 
	I don't see what's non-trivial about this.  It looks trivial.
In fact, I think the current wording of the draft standard is just fine.
"Sets of values" (for coverpoint bins) are specified as expressions, and
net identifiers may be expressions, too.  6.5 and 6.7 are clear enough
about what nets are and how they may be declared with integral data
types.
	 
	I recommend we do nothing about this one.
	 
	-- David
	 

	-- 
	This message has been scanned for viruses and 
	dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>
, and is 
	believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.