RE: [sv-ec] Ballot issue #106

This is a ballot issue. We are not required to accept the proposed
solution as stated, just make sure that the original issues is
addressed.

 

________________________________

From: Scott, David 
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 9:17 AM
To: Rich, Dave
Cc: sv-ec@server.eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Ballot issue #106

 

I believe we were told to work on ballot issues only.  I'd like
clarification from Mehdi and Neil on that.

Dave


Rich, Dave wrote: 

I would really like to make a covergroup output/inout arguments illegal.
There is no reason to allow these other than sloppiness.

 

I would also like to address ballot #110 in the same proposal by
mentioning that a ref argument is treated as const ref, and that const
ref only requires type compatibility with wires and variables.

 

Dave

 

 

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Scott, David
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 3:26 PM
To: sv-ec@server.eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] Ballot issue #106

 

This is the one about covergroup arguments using "output" ...

 

http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=2710

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is

believed to be clean. 

 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.