Re: [sv-ec] ballot issue #107

From: David Scott <david_scott_at_.....>
Date: Fri Apr 24 2009 - 09:30:56 PDT

Yes, that's a good clarification.  I'll do that.

Thanks,

Dave


Swapnajit Chakraborti wrote:

Hi Dave,

 

This looks fine to me. Do you think we can clarify it further by saying something like:

"The clocking event can be based on ref arguments of the covergroup."

 

Regds,

Swapnajit

---

From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Scott, David
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 4:51 AM
To: sv-ec@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ec] ballot issue #107

This asks the question whether a clocking event could be a ref argument of a covergroup.

 

We think yes, so I've made a proposal for a clarifying sentence in the discussion of clocking events.  It could be in the immediately preceding paragraph instead, but I think this is more natural.

 

http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=2711

 

-- David

 

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. Received on Fri Apr 24 09:37:22 2009