RE: [sv-ec] Proposal for Mantis 2451

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker@intel.com>
Date: Wed Aug 18 2010 - 09:48:46 PDT

Nitpick:

It means a little funny to write that they shall match exactly, with an exception. Oh, and there is another exception. And another.

Probably nicer to write,

"The out-of-block method declaration shall match the prototype declaration exactly with the following exceptions:"

Regards,
Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Steven Sharp
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 7:10 AM
> To: sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-ec] Proposal for Mantis 2451
>
> I have uploaded a proposal for Mantis 2451.
>
> In addition to the change for default argument values, I noticed that
> there
> was another syntactical difference allowed: a scope resolution on a
> function
> return type. The text would have been incorrect if it didn't mention
> that
> this difference was also allowed, so I tried to fix that as well.
>
> Let the nitpicking begin.
>
>
> Steven Sharp | Architect | Cadence
>
> P: 508.459.1436 M: 774.535.4149 www.cadence.com
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Aug 18 09:49:09 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 18 2010 - 09:49:22 PDT