Re: [sv-ec] Mantis 2505

I just had one comment on version v3 of the proposal.
var2 is declared to be an int, but p.buffer_size is
declared to be an integer. Wouldn't it be better to
have them both be of the same data type?

Neil Korpusik

On 09/27/10 13:00, Nilotpal Sensarkar wrote:
> Folks,
> The proposed changes were added.
> SV_LRM_Mantis2505v3.pdf is the latest file.
> Thanks,
> Neil S
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nilotpal Sensarkar
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 12:15 PM
> To: Nilotpal Sensarkar; neil.korpusik@oracle.com
> Cc: Rich, Dave; sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Mantis 2505
>
> Hi All,
> The proposal has been updated with inputs from SV-EC meeting. SV_LRM_Mantis2505v2.pdf is the latest file.
> Thanks,
> Neil S
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of Nilotpal Sensarkar
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 9:22 AM
> To: neil.korpusik@oracle.com
> Cc: Rich, Dave; sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec] Mantis 2505
>
> Hi All,
> The proposal has been updated and uploaded on Mantis using the SV template.
> As usual, comments are welcomed.
> Thanks,
> Neil S
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Korpusik [mailto:neil.korpusik@oracle.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 1:15 PM
> To: Nilotpal Sensarkar
> Cc: Rich, Dave; sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-ec] Mantis 2505
>
> The proposal also needs to be with regards to 1800-2009.
> This writeup seems to be with regards to the older 1800-2005.
>
> All of the proposed changes should be colored blue. Examples
> shouldn't be shown using italicized text. They should look
> like other examples in the existing LRM.
>
> When adding text to the existing LRM, you need to show at least
> some of the existing text in that portion of the LRM so that
> we know where this new text will be added. There should be
> enough of the existing text to make it easier for the reviewers
> to fully understand the changes. Doing that prevents oversights.
>
>
> Neil Korpusik
>
>
>
>
> On 09/22/10 13:02, Rich, Dave wrote:
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>>
>>
>> Proposals need to be in the form of instructions to the editor. See
>> Mantis 1302 and 1336 for some examples.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] *On Behalf Of
>> *Nilotpal Sensarkar
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:40 AM
>> *To:* sv-ec@eda.org
>> *Subject:* [sv-ec] Mantis 2505
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Clarification/proposal for Mantis-2505 has been updated. Please feel
>> free to comment.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.