Re: [sv-ec] A minor item for EC - maybe Feb 14th meeting?

Shalom

Thanks for picking that up. I'll fix it in time for this evening's meeting.

Thinking a bit more about this: 7.4.6 says

    The result of reading from an array with an
    invalid index shall return the default
    uninitialized value for the array element type

which has the same ambiguity that I mistakenly put into an early version of the
2794 proposal; I'm pretty sure the "default uninitialized value" really should
come from Table 7-1 just as it does for associative arrays. We also ought to
fix the missing entries for real and chandle in Table 7-1. Do we have
time/energy/mandate to address this kind of thing, and should BC or EC do it?
I'm happy to update 1067 and write a proposal, if you think it's appropriate.

Jonathan

----- Original Message ----
> From: "Bresticker, Shalom" <shalom.bresticker@intel.com>
> The reference in the introductory note should be to Mantis 1067, not 1076.
>
> Regards,
> Shalom
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> > Jonathan Bromley
> > Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 10:43 PM
> > To: sv-ec@eda.org
> > Subject: [sv-ec] A minor item for EC - maybe Feb 14th meeting?
> >
> > hi EC
> >
> > I've uploaded a revised proposal (version 3) for 2794, addressing the
> > Champions' feedback from October. Could folk kindly take a look at it,
> > and then perhaps we can deal with it quickly in this meeting or the
> > next?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jonathan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.