Re: [sv-ec] RE: Interface Class proposal update

A couple of initial issues with the grammar. An interface class does
not have
an "implements", it has an "extends". An "implements" does not allow a
class_type, it only allows an interface_class_identifier. I don't think
that "lifetime" makes sense for an interface class. Why are you allowing
const vars in an interface class? I thought we were only allowing params,
types, and methods. Why use data_declaration? Can't that just be
type_declaration?

That's all I have time for right now.

Gord.

On 5/10/2011 11:02 AM, Mehdi Mohtashemi wrote:
>
> Thanks Tom for all your efforts to update the proposal.
>
> Although it is aggressive, I hope we can update the proposal by this
> Friday, this
>
> will give us a chance to place it for email vote if at all possible.
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Mehdi
>
> *From:*owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Alsop, Thomas R
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 10, 2011 10:55 AM
> *To:* sv-ec@eda.org
> *Subject:* [sv-ec] Interface Class proposal update
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I have updated the Interface Class (Multiple Inheritance) proposal
> with the latest set of resolutions to related mantis items. Thanks so
> much for driving all these other resolutions. This really helped
> bring the IC proposal together. I have uploaded the proposal onto the
> mantis site but I have attached it here as well for your convenience.
> I tried to put comments alongside all the changes I made since rev2
> to note the resolutions and how I addressed them in the proposal.
> Hopefully this will allow you to focus in on these changes. I have
> also added a BNF for interface classes and updated the BNF for classes
> to include implements.
>
> I am assuming we'll need a round or two of BNF and other wording
> clarification. Let's set a goal of getting this review done and
> feedback provided by early next week. Then I'll write up the final
> draft for voting.
>
> Thanks, -Tom
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Vreugdenhil                                503-685-0808
Model Technology (Mentor Graphics)                gordonv@model.com
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.