RE: [sv-ec]Email Vote: Response requested by Wednesday May 11 2011 11:59pm

Hi Ray:

Yes, I believe that the cross functions cannot be called outside of the cross where they are declared. I will add that restriction as well as add the grammar to Annex A and remove the two covergroup options.

If I haven't received any additional feedback then I will upload the modified version tomorrow morning.

Thanks,
Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Ryan, Ray
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 12:12 PM
> To: sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec]Email Vote: Response requested by Wednesday May 11
> 2011 11:59pm
>
> (1) Mantis 3046 _X_Yes ___No
>
> (2) Mantis 2506 ___Yes _X_No
>
> The BNF changes need to be replicated in Annex A. Also does there need
> to be a restriction on the visibility of functions declared within the
> scope of a cross.
>
> (3) Mantis 3531 _X_Yes ___No
>
> (4) Mantis 3394 _X_Yes ___No
>
> (5) Mantis 2905 _X_Yes ___No
>
> (6) Mantis 3254 _X_Yes ___No
>
> (7) Mantis 3298 _X_Yes ___No
>
> (8) Mantis 3054 _X_Yes ___No
>
> (9) Mantis 2935 _X_Yes ___No
>
>
> Regards,
> Ray Ryan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Mehdi Mohtashemi
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 9:15 AM
> To: sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ec]Email Vote: Response requested by Wednesday May 11
> 2011 11:59pm
> Importance: High
>
> For those members who have not sent in their votes, please take a few
> minutes
> and provide your input/votes. Thanks,
> Mehdi
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Mehdi Mohtashemi
> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 8:54 AM
> To: sv-ec@eda.org
> Subject: FW: [sv-ec](updated) Email Vote: Response requested by
> Wednesday May 11 2011 11:59pm
> Importance: High
>
> PLEASE REVIEW AND SEND IN YOUR EMAIL VOTES.
>
> [to the reflector, you can copy me as well]
>
>
> We are conducting an email vote for the following 9 sv-ec mantis
> items.
> -You have until 11:59pm PDT, Wednesday May 11, 2011 to respond by email
> -An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible
> voters respond with a YES vote.
> -If a NO vote is given on any issue, you must include a valid reason.
> The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference
> call.
> -Mark your vote with an X in the appropriate response.
> -The vote is to approve the mantis item with the proposal given, or
> to CLOSE (duplicate/already fixed) as indicated in each mantis row
> below.
>
> [9 mantis items: 3046, 2506, 3531, 3394, 2905, 3254, 3298, 3054, 2935]
> As of the April 25, 2011 sv-ec meeting, the eligible voters are:
>
> 1.Arturo Salz
> 2.Dave Rich
> 3.Francoise Martinolle
> 4.Neil Korpusik
> 5.Ray Ryan
> 6.Gordon Vreugdenhil
> 7.Steven Sharp
> 8.Mark Hartoog
> 9.Tom Alsop
> 10.Neil S [Marvel]
> 11.Alex Gran
> 12.Scott Little
>
> (1) Mantis 3046 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3046
> [Dotted names within inlined constraints]
> [proposal: 3046_inline_dotted_names.pdf]
>
> (2) Mantis 2506 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2506
> [Non-trivial coverage space shapes and joint conditions are difficult
> to specify with covergroups]
> [proposal: Proposal for Mantis 2506_v5.pdf]
>
> (3) Mantis 3531 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3531
> [null should be allowed in constant expressions]
> [proposal file: 3531_null.pdf]
>
> (4) Mantis 3394 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3394
> [invalid example for dynamic array]
> [proposal: 3394_illegal_example.pdf]
>
> (5) Mantis 2905 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2905
> [BNF bug for attribute instance along with timeunits_declaration]
> [proposal: 2905_attribute_timeunits.pdf]
>
> (6) Mantis 3254 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3254
> [18.5.6 if-else constraints mistakenly uses the work "block" when it
> means "set"]
> [proposal: 3254_constraint_set.pdf]
>
> (7) Mantis 3298 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3298
> [Use of 'this' in a coverpoint expression]
> [proposal: 3298_this_covergroup.pdf]
>
> (8) Mantis 3054 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3054
> CLOSE as duplicate of 3202 (sv-ac)
> [$countones and $onehot system functions in constraints]
>
> (9) Mantis 2935 ___Yes ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2935
> CLOSE: already fixed in new version of the LRM and uploaded
> [Correction to example in 9.7. in 1800-2009]
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.