For the first issue, how about Steven's "the first time it is reached during execution"?
Shalom
> (3) Mantis 2900 ___Yes _X_No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2900
> Title: Associative array should consider the context of an lvalue to create
> an entry]
> [proposal: 2900_assoc_lvalue2.pdf]
>
> I am fine with the intent of this proposal, but I think the wording is
> unclear.
>
> In particular, in the phrase "the first time it appears as the target", the
> term "appear" does not seem like a good choice. The idea is that this
> occurs the first time the context where it appears is executed. But
> "appears" doesn't indicate execution. In a sense, the entry "appears as the
> target of an assignment" as soon as the user writes the code.
>
> The term "appears" is reasonable when talking about syntax being seen. If
> the user or a parser is reading the source code sequentially from the start,
> the entry "first appears" at the point where it is first seen in such a
> scan. But execution isn't a sequential scan and it executes code rather
> than "seeing" it.
>
> I understand that part of this is deliberate. The point is that the element
> is allocated when the construct is reached during execution, even if the
> part where it is used as an lvalue isn't executed until slightly later. So
> describing it in terms of execution isn't right either. It is based on
> "appearing", but appearing in something that has started executing.
>
> My apologies for not noting this earlier, but it became more obvious to me
> when I actually read the text of the proposal.
>
> Also, "context of an assignment" doesn't seem to include use as a ref
> argument. The description as an lvalue in the Mantis item was more correct,
> though the term may not be defined in the LRM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sat Jul 2 23:44:08 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jul 02 2011 - 23:44:20 PDT