At a top conceptual level:
Is it intended to allow 'soft' constraints within conditional contexts (if-then-else or implication)?
I believe the proposed grammar does allow (ignoring for now syntax precedence issues).
constraint C1 {
if ( condition ) {
a < b soft;
} else {
a < b;
}
}
The grammar seems to NOT allow specifying a soft if-then-else constraint or a soft implication constraint.
That is the 'soft' qualifier can't be applied to "expr1 -> expr2;" or "if (exp1) { exp2 } else {expr3}".
A question for the Users: what kinds of constraints would you want to be able to specify as 'soft' ?
Regards,
Ray
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Aug 15 15:54:48 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 15 2011 - 15:54:52 PDT