Is it clearly defined that ranges are not allowed on associative arrays?
The LRM does define an ordering, depending on the type of index.
Shalom
From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Berking
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 8:13 PM
To: sv-cc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-cc] Mantis item #3737 re. ranges of AAs
All-
I logged this item yesterday and I have just uploaded a proposal. I contend here that ranges for AA's do not generally make sense, and we should use 'empty ranges' to represent them (as we do now for intermediate dimensions- including dynamic arrays and queues).
Please have a look- feedback welcome. Charlie please add this to our next meeting's agenda.
Thanks,
Chuck
Chuck Berking | Member of Consulting Staff | Cadence
P: 978.262.6522 M: 603.253.9130 www.cadence.com<http://www.cadence.com/>
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sat Aug 20 21:50:03 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Aug 20 2011 - 21:50:16 PDT