RE: [sv-bc] email voting for several proposals - STATUS UPDATE

Subject: RE: [sv-bc] email voting for several proposals - STATUS UPDATE
From: Srouji, Johny (johny.srouji@intel.com)
Date: Tue Feb 18 2003 - 08:58:49 PST

• Next message: Steven Sharp: "Re: [sv-bc] For Future Consideration: Macros & Semicolons"
• Previous message: Vassilios.Gerousis@Infineon.Com: "[sv-bc] Patent 6,141,630 From Verisity On Coverage Database - To be Discu ssed at the Full SV Meeting"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi All,

Attached is a sheet which summarizes the email voting results so far. Based
on this all proposals PASS except for three (which are marked in orange). We
will need to finalize these in our next tele-call. I have also fixed a typo
with one of the links.

Regards,

--- Johny.

-----Original Message-----
From: Srouji, Johny
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:27 PM
To: sv-bc@eda.org
Cc: Srouji, Johny
Subject: [sv-bc] email voting for several proposals

Hi All,

There is a back log of existing proposals, which we have not been able to
vote on in committee. It is not expected that all of these to pass, but it
is desirable to get all of the changes we can all agree to in the editorial
process as soon as possible. Here is the process that we agreed on, during
our last F2F meeting, Jan 22nd:

* Whoever does not vote, will be assumed as not objecting

* If an eligible voting member votes against it, the topic will be
brought up for a discussion

The voting will close on by the end of next Tuesday, Feb 18th. .

I have a couple of requests:

* Please submit your vote below, as YES or NO. If you vote NO,
please come up w/ a counter proposal and/or modifications/reasons, and
submit it by Feb 25th

* It would be useful to get all votes (to be used as a straw poll,
if needed)

Thanks,

--- Johny.

__yes __no SV-BC20 Typedef and generate issues

                         URL under: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0061.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0061.html

__yes __no SV-BC21-1,2,3 Granularity issues and function sensitivites

                         URL under: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0292.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0292.html

__yes __no SV-BC29 Need bits to real and real to bits
                         URL under: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0293.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0293.html

__yes __no SV-BC2 Time Precision and timescale

                         URL under: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0326.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0326.html

__yes __no SV-BC58 Slices of unpacked arrays
                         URL under: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0331.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0331.html

__yes __no SV-BC5 Data alignment and packing

                         URL under: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0363.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0363.html

__yes __no SV-BC10b-1 Mascarading descriptions for VCD
                         URL under: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0380.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0380.html

__yes __no SV-BC62a Simpler declaration of unpacked struct lits
                         URL under: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0382.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0382.html

__yes __no SV-BC68 BNF Issues
                         URL under: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0404.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0404.html

__yes __no SV-BC60 Modport syntax issues
                         URL under: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0410.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0410.html

__yes __no SV-BC18h,i logic variable issues

                         URL under: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0415.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0415.html

__yes __no SV-BC35 task port declarations in BNF

                         URL under: <http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0417.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0417.html

__yes __no SV-BC8-5 Issues with time data type

                         SV-BC12 Constant exprs; difference among
decls
                         SV-BC16f Issue with extern forkjoin task
 
<http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0422.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0422.html

__yes __no SV-BC66 Update BNF to reflect ETF changes
 
<http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0433.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0433.html

__yes __no SV-BC45 Dynamic checking of enums is expensive
<http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0434.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0434.html

__yes __no SV-BC67 () after interface instantiation needed
 
<http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0435.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0435.html

__yes __no SV-BC65 Structure literals vs concat determination
 
<http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0436.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0436.html

__yes __no SV-BC35 Structure literals vs concat determination
 
<http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0445.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0445.html

__yes __no SV-BC34a Multiple namespaces exist
 
<http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0446.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0446.html

__yes __no SV-BC19-17a signed function declarations (BNF)

                         SV-BC62b Packed array of packed structs
 
<http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0454.html>
http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/0454.html

• text/html attachment: email-votes-02_18_03.htm

• Next message: Steven Sharp: "Re: [sv-bc] For Future Consideration: Macros & Semicolons"
• Previous message: Vassilios.Gerousis@Infineon.Com: "[sv-bc] Patent 6,141,630 From Verisity On Coverage Database - To be Discu ssed at the Full SV Meeting"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Feb 18 2003 - 09:00:03 PST