[sv-bc] concern about weighted average scheme

Hi Folks:

I have some concern about the weighted average scheme for scoring the
results of everyone's prioritizations.

I had hoped that we would each be given a mass to distribute (like the
lucky bucks doled out by Karen Pieper in the requirements gathering
meeting) and that we could each distribute our mass as we saw fit.

With the current scheme, if I have high priority on only a few items,
there is no way for me to focus my mass on those items. Essentially, my
input no longer counts.

Can the mechanism be amended in some way to avoid this prejudice against
persons with small numbers of items of key interest?

Best regards,

John Havlicek

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.