RE: [sv-bc] Section 28.9 typo

Greg,

I believe it *is* legal. Look at 28.3.

Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Greg Jaxon
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 6:16 AM
> To: SV_BC List
> Subject: [sv-bc] Section 28.9 typo
>
> Section 28.9 covering cmos switches uses an example wherein the gates
> are not given instance names - illegal syntax.
> I think this happens because the equivalence it is trying to
> illustrate
> is not available as a mere rewrite of the netlist.
> Can we do something to indicate that this example is not legal code?
>
> Greg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.