[sv-bc] RE: Posted draft of Top-25 Presentation to 1800 WG

Hi,

Looks pretty good.

On slide 3, the statement "Votes receive weight proportional to priority" is somewhat ambiguous.

The word "comprehend" in "Top-25 does not comprehend effort or schedule" probably should be something else.

On slide 7, on addressing items not in Top-25, I would propose that the sub-committee be allowed to address an additional issue if a proposer comes with a proposal that is complete or at least almost complete.

Another question is how to relate to new issues that will come up in the future. It is reasonable to assume that there will be arise some issues that will be considered urgent.

I'll review slide 6 later.

Regards,
Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Maidment, Matthew R
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 8:34 AM
> To: sv-bc@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-bc] Posted draft of Top-25 Presentation to 1800 WG
>
> Have a look and send feedback.
>
> http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/SV-BC%20Scope%20for%201800-2012.pdf
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.