I think a feature needs to be on one of the technical committees top 25
list to get the attention it needs, regardless of which committee ends
up working out the final proposal. Of course, no priority list can be
cast in stone for that a long period of time without some adjustments.
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Maidment, Matthew R
> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 6:46 AM
> To: Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-bc@eda.org
> Cc: sv-ac@server.eda.org; KORPUSIK,NEIL; Karen Pieper; Even-haim,
Daniel
> Subject: [sv-bc] RE: Posted draft of Top-25 Presentation to 1800 WG
>
> It's not out of the realm of possibility for SV-BC, but not currently
a
> priority.
> The 1800 WG is the right place to begin resolution of this issues.
>
> I request this be part of the SV-AC report-out to the 1800 WG.
>
> Matt
> --
> Matt Maidment
> mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Korchemny, Dmitry
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:07 AM
> >To: Maidment, Matthew R; sv-bc@eda.org
> >Cc: sv-ac@server.eda.org; KORPUSIK,NEIL; Karen Pieper; Even-haim,
Daniel
> >Subject: RE: Posted draft of Top-25 Presentation to 1800 WG
> >
> >Hi Matt,
> >
> >As I can see, the Mantis 3025 "Introduce elaboration-time function
for
> type
> >compatibility check" is not among 25 top priority issues of SV-BC. I
> >believe that this enhancement is really important for checkers, while
> its
> >implementation effort should not be big. This item by its nature
belongs
> to
> >the competence area of SV-BC, though its main usage is expected to be
in
> >checkers. Should SV-AC own this item?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Dmitry
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> >Maidment, Matthew R
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 8:34 AM
> >To: sv-bc@eda.org
> >Subject: [sv-bc] Posted draft of Top-25 Presentation to 1800 WG
> >
> >Have a look and send feedback.
> >
> >http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/SV-BC%20Scope%20for%201800-2012.pdf
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Matt
> >
> >
> >--
> >This message has been scanned for viruses and
> >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> >believed to be clean.
> >
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed May 12 08:02:32 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 12 2010 - 08:04:59 PDT