Hi, Daniel.
2678 is open.
The proposal attached is 2678 was a tentative proposal that was never adopted.
Regards,
Shalom
> Mantis Item 3080 (.name() and escaped identifiers):
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> sv-bc has voted to close this as a duplicate of 2678. However, I think
> that the proposal associated with 2678 is inconsistent with section
> 5.6.1 of the Standard which states that:
>
> "Neither the leading backslash character nor the terminating white
> space is considered to be part of the identifier. Therefore, an escaped
> identifier \cpu3 is treated the same as a nonescaped identifier cpu3."
>
> since this implies that the leading backslash and the terminating white
> space should not be included.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Oct 25 11:50:29 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 25 2010 - 11:53:00 PDT