if this is how it should work then imho lrm should clarify such
behaviour as it is not obvious
DANiel
On 2/13/2011 3:07 PM, Bresticker, Shalom wrote:
>
> In this case, the two simulators I tested gave the same results:
>
> 00000001000000020000000300000004
>
> 00000002000000040000000000000000
>
> One explicitly noted that the static data members would be ignored.
>
> Regards,
>
> Shalom
>
> *From:*owner-sv-bc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-bc@eda.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Daniel Mlynek
> *Sent:* Friday, February 11, 2011 11:08 AM
> *To:* sv-bc@eda.org
> *Subject:* [sv-bc] streaming operator and class static members
>
> LRM do not say explicitly if static class members should be packed
> with streaming operator.
> IMO it should be said as this is not so obvious.
> >From one perspective static member is a data member, from the other
> it will not carry data specific to the handle....
>
> Please take a look on example:
>
> class A;
> static int p1=1;
> int p2=2;
> static int p3=3;
> int p4=4;
> endclass
> module top;
> bit [127:0] v;
> A a = new;
>
> initial begin
> v = { >> {a} }; // tylko pola p2, p4? Wszystkie pola?
> $display("%h",{a.p1, a.p2, a.p3, a.p4});
> $display("%h", v);
> end
>
> endmodule
>
> DANiel
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Feb 13 22:17:23 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 13 2011 - 22:17:35 PST