[sv-bc] Re: [sv-ec] New Operating Procedures

The last question from the attachment:

   Are entity working group email reflectors closed to non-members?
   Yes. Entity working groups may use the public area of their website
   to share needed information with those who may wish to begin
   participation in the working group.

I hope there are some "entity members" of P1800 on the Verilog-AMS reflector,
who will be able to keep tabs on potential conflicts as the AMS committee
works on SV-AMS. Apparently, I'm going to get removed from all the sv-
reflectors.

I'm curious, though: the sb_bylaws.pdf document Karen cites says:

   Each entity project is required to host its working group email
   reflector(s) through the IEEE, with designated IEEE staff serving
   as administrators.

However, it seems to me that all the sv-*@eda.org reflectors are
not "hosted through the IEEE" since eda.org is owned by Accellera.
So, perhaps Karen should be creating new reflectors at ieee.org
and only copying over to the new lists those e-mail addresses of
entity members.

-Geoffrey

Karen Pieper wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> With today's DASC meeting, new operating rules come into effect for us.
> We will discuss these at the next P1800 meeting. Attached is a FAQ
> about the operating procedures, and the bylaws can be found at:
>
> http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sb_bylaws.pdf
>
> I will start removing email addresses from entities who are not IEEE
> member entities from the reflectors over the next few weeks.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Karen
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.

Attachment "CMM FAQ final.doc" removed by G Coram.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.