[sv-bc] Re: [P1800] Re: [sv-ec] New Operating Procedures

The compromise reached in the DASC was that the reflectors would be limited, but the web availability would be left the same.

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 14, 2011, at 11:11 AM, David Smith <David.Smith@synopsys.com> wrote:

> Karen,
>
> Using the eda.org reflectors you will need to make sure that the hypermail links are only accessible from authenticated users. Using TWiki helps this but you may have to add authentication in each of the hypermail directories as well. Otherwise everyone in the world can see the email archive (as they currently can for most groups).
>
>
> Regards
>
> David
>
>
>
> David W. Smith
>
> Synopsys Scientist
>
>
>
> Synopsys, Inc.
>
> Synopsys Technology Park
>
> 2025 NW Cornelius Pass Road
>
> Hillsboro, OR 97124
>
>
>
> Voice: 503.547.6467
>
> Main: 503.547.6000
>
> Cell: 503.560.5389
>
> FAX: 503.547.6906
>
> Email: david.smith@synopsys.com
>
> http://www.synopsys.com
>
>
>
> Saber Accelerates Robust Design
>
> Predictable. Repeatable. Reliable. Proven.
>
>
>
> From: owner-ieee1800@eda.org [mailto:owner-ieee1800@eda.org] On Behalf Of Karen Pieper
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 10:41 AM
> To: Geoffrey.Coram; VerilogAMS Reflector
> Cc: IEEE 1800; SV Champions; SV-AC eda.org; SV-BC eda.org; SV-CC; SV-DC; sv-ec
> Subject: [P1800] Re: [sv-ec] New Operating Procedures
>
>
>
> We will remain on the eda.org reflectors for the time being, and I will review the members of each list.
>
> We have asked Karen Bartleson to take back to the CAG the need for more joint meetings and coordination with related standards.
>
> Karen
>
>
>
> From: Geoffrey.Coram <geoffrey.coram@analog.com>
> To: VerilogAMS Reflector <verilog-ams@eda.org>
> Cc: Karen Pieper <karen_l_pieper@yahoo.com>; IEEE 1800 <ieee1800@eda.org>; SV Champions <sv-champions@eda.org>; SV-AC eda.org <sv-ac@eda.org>; SV-BC eda.org <sv-bc@eda.org>; SV-CC <sv-cc@eda.org>; SV-DC <sv-dc@eda.org>; sv-ec <sv-ec@eda.org>
> Sent: Mon, February 14, 2011 10:34:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [sv-ec] New Operating Procedures
>
> The last question from the attachment:
>
> Are entity working group email reflectors closed to non-members?
> Yes. Entity working groups may use the public area of their website
> to share needed information with those who may wish to begin
> participation in the working group.
>
> I hope there are some "entity members" of P1800 on the Verilog-AMS reflector,
> who will be able to keep tabs on potential conflicts as the AMS committee
> works on SV-AMS. Apparently, I'm going to get removed from all the sv-
> reflectors.
>
> I'm curious, though: the sb_bylaws.pdf document Karen cites says:
>
> Each entity project is required to host its working group email
> reflector(s) through the IEEE, with designated IEEE staff serving
> as administrators.
>
> However, it seems to me that all the sv-*@eda.org reflectors are
> not "hosted through the IEEE" since eda.org is owned by Accellera.
> So, perhaps Karen should be creating new reflectors at ieee.org
> and only copying over to the new lists those e-mail addresses of
> entity members.
>
> -Geoffrey
>
>
>
> Karen Pieper wrote:
> > Hi, all,
> >
> > With today's DASC meeting, new operating rules come into effect for us. We will discuss these at the next P1800 meeting. Attached is a FAQ about the operating procedures, and the bylaws can be found at:
> >
> > http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sb_bylaws.pdf
> >
> > I will start removing email addresses from entities who are not IEEE member entities from the reflectors over the next few weeks.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Karen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> > believed to be clean.
>
> Attachment "CMM FAQ final.doc" removed by G Coram.
>
>
>
> Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels
> in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.