Re: [sv-bc] Email Vote: Respond by 8AM PDT Wed Apr 20

I vote yes on all, except the last one

> SVDB  3384 ___Yes   _X__No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3384

The time type doesn't fit naturally into a sentence about scalar
types. An array of times defaults to unsigned? Doesn't every packed
array of anything default to unsigned, and unpacked arrays don't have
signedness?

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Maidment, Matthew R
<matthew.r.maidment@intel.com> wrote:
>
> -You have until 8am PDT, Wednesday April 20, 2011 to respond
> -An issue passes if there are zero NO votes and half of the eligible
>  voters respond with a YES vote.
> -If you vote NO on any issue, your vote must be accompanied by a reason.
>  The issue will then be up for discussion during a future conference call.
> -Note: The proposed action is captured in the bug note
>       (resolve as duplicate, already addressed, etc.).
>
> As of the April 11, 2011 meeting, the eligible voters are:
>
> Steven Sharp
> Francoise Martinolle
> Tom Alsop
> Shalom Bresticker
> Dave Rich
> Gordon Vreugdenhil
> Alex Gran
> Arnab Saha
> Eric Coffin
> Brad Pierce
> Mark Hartoog
>
> SVDB  2595 ___Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2595
>
> SVDB  2976 ___Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2976
>
> SVDB  2977 ___Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2977
>
> SVDB  2982 ___Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=2982
>
> SVDB  3026 ___Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3026
>
> SVDB  3062 ___Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3062
>
> SVDB  3274 ___Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3274
>
> SVDB  3362 ___Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3362
>
> SVDB  3384 ___Yes   ___No
> http://www.eda.org/svdb/view.php?id=3384
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.